When IrokoTV first launched, it felt like the future. A bold attempt to build the “Netflix of Africa,” it promised to revolutionize the way Nigerians and the world consumed Nollywood content. Backed by millions in venture capital, a tech-savvy founder, and the right cultural product, it checked every box. But more than a decade later, Iroko quietly exited its consumer streaming operations, leaving behind a $100 million question: why didn’t it work?
IrokoTV didn’t fail because it lacked vision. It failed because that vision didn’t match Nigeria’s economic and infrastructural reality. Subscriptions require stability—stable internet, stable income, stable billing. Nigeria, with its erratic power supply, low average income, and unreliable internet penetration, wasn’t built for the kind of smooth streaming experience Western VOD models rely on. Data was (and still is) expensive. Broadband was unreliable. Credit card adoption? Low. And beyond tech, the average Nigerian wasn’t conditioned to pay monthly fees for movies they were used to watching on Africa Magic or pirated DVDs. The market simply didn’t move as fast as the founders and investors needed it to.
At its peak, IrokoTV raised and spent well over $100 million in total funding and revenue, a rare feat in Nigeria’s media tech space. Most of that money went into building a platform that users either couldn’t access or didn’t need. The bet was clear: if you build it, they will subscribe. But after years of trying to localize Silicon Valley logic in a Lagos context, even founder Jason Njoku admitted it: the math wasn’t mathing. The irony? Iroko’s true asset wasn’t the platform. It was the content. ROK Studios, IrokoTV’s in-house production company, was churning out soap operas, films, and telenovela-style series by the truckload. While the streaming experiment struggled, ROK kept growing. It was lean, consistent, and in tune with what audiences actually watched. In 2019, ROK was acquired by Canal+ in a multi-million dollar deal. The platform lost. The content won.
The IrokoTV story is a business case study masquerading as a media cautionary tale. For today’s Nigerian filmmakers and producers dreaming of digital dominance, the lesson is subtle but sharp. Local behavior beats global trends. Just because streaming works abroad doesn’t mean it scales here without major tweaks. Don’t chase platforms. Own the content. ROK outlived IrokoTV because IP travels. Platforms die; stories don’t. Revenue isn’t romantic. It’s better to quietly earn through syndication and licensing than loudly burn VC money on visibility.
It’s tempting to copy what tech giants are doing, but Nigeria’s media landscape has its own rules. Nollywood isn’t just a film industry, it’s a cultural economy shaped by affordability, improvisation, and direct-to-consumer resilience. That doesn’t mean streaming has no future. It means the dream has to be adjusted. IrokoTV reached for the sky, and in many ways, it helped build the ceiling higher for everyone else. But the lesson is clear: sometimes the most profitable play isn’t building the stage. It’s owning the show.
Leave a comment